KBS Reference Desk: Medical Screening and the Fourth Amendment

Q:        The District has implemented mandatory medical screening—in the form of a “no-touch” temperature gun—of employees who enter the administration building in an effort to prevent the spread of COVID-19.  The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently issued guidance suggesting that such testing is permissible, but a custodial employee has alleged that the screening “violates his Fourth Amendment rights.” Is he correct?

A:        No. Using a no-touch temperature gun to screen for COVID-19 would likely be considered reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

Subjecting an employee to mandatory medical screening is certainly not without risk; however, such risk may be minimized if the screening is conducted in accordance with established court authority, as well as federal, state, and local guidance. While case law addressing medical screening in the pandemic context is virtually nonexistent, courts have assessed medical screening in other frameworks—such as mandatory drug testing of employees or students—that provide guidance to assess risk and draw best practices.

Ordinarily, to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, a search must be based on individualized suspicion. However, courts have permitted suspicionless drug testing of employees when the employer has established a “special need” to conduct the testing. Similarly, courts have permitted random drug testing as a condition of student participation in athletics. In either case, courts balance the individual’s privacy interests against the promotion of legitimate and/or compelling government interests. When the drug testing is deemed reasonable, a central theme justifying such testing is safety—whether it be safety concerns for the individual being tested, others around him, or both.

In the above hypothetical, any Fourth Amendment challenge by the janitor would be overcome by the balancing of interests in favor of the school district. The District’s interests are both legitimate and compelling; that is, the screening is being conducted to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Given the virus’s highly contagious and deadly nature, the screening in every sense has the potential to prevent suffering and save lives. Moreover, the privacy intrusion is minimal—the District is using a no-touch temperature gun to determine whether the employee has a fever. Under these circumstances, the testing is likely to be considered reasonable for Fourth Amendment purposes.

The next logical extension of a temperature gun is a requirement for COVID-19 testing prior to return to duty. While, again, analysis of the Fourth Amendment in a pandemic setting is novel, application of existing case law to our current health crisis would bend in favor of employment policies that require COVID-19 testing of all employees (as opposed to just using a temperature gun), so long as 1) the testing is conducted using low intrusive methods (for example, a mouth swab instead of a Q-tip up the nose); 2) the testing takes place in a private setting (such as a private classroom instead of a crowded hallway or cafeteria); and 3) the results are disclosed only to those who “need to know.” Also, it is more favorable if the test used by the District only detects COVID-19, as opposed to detecting a variety of information about the subject’s body, such as ingested substances like drugs or alcohol. For specific questions or additional information, please contact your local school attorney.

Related Posts

Recent Articles

KBS Reference Desk: On Call Employees Over Holidays
December 17, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Holiday Decorations
December 10, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Removal of Library Books
December 3, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Attendance Waivers
November 19, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: HB 103 Texas Active Shooter Alert
November 12, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Remote Learning and ADA-Funding
November 5, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: CBD Oil
October 29, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Temporary Custodians of Record – TPIA
October 22, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Dyslexia Handbook Update
October 15, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Peace Officer Legislation
October 8, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: HB 1525 PTO Donations
October 1, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: State Certifications Update – SB 13 & SB 19
September 24, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Accelerated and Supplemental Instruction HB 4545
September 17, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Active Threat Excercises
September 10, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: HB 1927 Firearms
September 3, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Remote Participation in Board Meetings
August 27, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Waiving Minimum Attendance Requirements for Seriously Ill Students
August 20, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Inquiring About Vaccine Status
August 13, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Temporary Suspension of TPIA due to Catastrophe
August 6, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Standard for Reporting Child Abuse and Neglect
July 30, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Bullying Policies and Reporting SB 2050
July 23, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Homeschoolers and UIL
July 16, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: TOMA Suspension Extension
July 9, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Revision to Resignation without Penalty Deadline
July 2, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: SB 179 School Counselors
June 25, 2021