KBS Reference Desk: Teachers Wearing Safety Pins

Q:        Several high school teachers have started to wear safety pins on their shirts in protest of the recent presidential election. The teachers have taken to Facebook to publicize their cause and it has resulted in many debates at school between students and staff. One such debate resulted in two students engaging in a fist fight. Can we prohibit the teachers from wearing the safety pins to work?

A:        Probably. While not an overtly political display, wearing items with political meaning is considered “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, has ruled that public school teachers may be reasonably limited in their protected speech if it creates a disruption to the school.

After the recent presidential election, many began wearing safety pins on their shirts as a sign of political solidarity with marginalized groups. The display is meant to signify a “link,” showing support for racial minorities, immigrants, members of the LGBT community and other minority groups. While wearing a safety pin may not be as overt a political message as, say, wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat, this type of speech may still be limited if it creates a disruption on your campus.

In Tinker v. Des Moines, the U.S. Supreme Court outlined the parameters of “symbolic speech” in a public school system. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 395 U.S. 503 (1969). In the case, five students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school banned these armbands immediately before any disagreement occurred and the case ensued. The Court found that while both students and teachers “do not shed their Constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate,” free speech may be limited by a governmental entity in certain contexts. In analyzing the case, the Court noted that the armbands were a “silent, passive expression of opinion unaccompanied by any disorder or disturbance.” The Court found that “fear of disturbance” is not enough to ban speech. To justify a prohibition of expression, the school must be able to show that “its action was caused by something more than a mere desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint.” Ultimately, the Court sided with the students because the armbands had caused no disruption or disorder at the time the prohibition was put in place.

When directing your staff not to engage in this type of political display, make sure that your school can meet the standard of “disruption” before prohibiting the expression. As a rule of thumb, if the student population is distracted by the display to the point where class time is disrupted, the Tinker standard can likely be met. Avoid prohibiting speech or expression before any disagreement has actually occurred simply because the District expects dissention. When faced with any First Amendment issue in your schools, it is advisable to contact your local school district’s attorney to ensure that the analysis is applied correctly to your specific facts.

Related Posts

Recent Articles

KBS Reference Desk: On Call Employees Over Holidays
December 17, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Holiday Decorations
December 10, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Removal of Library Books
December 3, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Attendance Waivers
November 19, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: HB 103 Texas Active Shooter Alert
November 12, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Remote Learning and ADA-Funding
November 5, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: CBD Oil
October 29, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Temporary Custodians of Record – TPIA
October 22, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Dyslexia Handbook Update
October 15, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Peace Officer Legislation
October 8, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: HB 1525 PTO Donations
October 1, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: State Certifications Update – SB 13 & SB 19
September 24, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Accelerated and Supplemental Instruction HB 4545
September 17, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Active Threat Excercises
September 10, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: HB 1927 Firearms
September 3, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Remote Participation in Board Meetings
August 27, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Waiving Minimum Attendance Requirements for Seriously Ill Students
August 20, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Inquiring About Vaccine Status
August 13, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Temporary Suspension of TPIA due to Catastrophe
August 6, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Standard for Reporting Child Abuse and Neglect
July 30, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Bullying Policies and Reporting SB 2050
July 23, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Homeschoolers and UIL
July 16, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: TOMA Suspension Extension
July 9, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Revision to Resignation without Penalty Deadline
July 2, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: SB 179 School Counselors
June 25, 2021